But luckily, so far research shows that sunscreen nanoparticles are not absorbed but remain on the surface of the skin or in the uppermost (dead) layer of the skin. We wrote more about nanoparticles and the concerns around them here, but the gist is that if nanoparticles were absorbed into the skin that would be a reason for legitimate health concerns. Still, it's white and disturbing enough to use Zinc Oxide nanoparticles more and more often. Pinnell, it's slightly less white than TiO2. It leaves a disturbing whitish tint on the skin, although, according to a 2000 research paper by Dr. It's also often used to treat skin irritations such as diaper rash.Īs for the disadvantages, Zinc Oxide is also not cosmetically elegant. So much so that Zinc Oxide also counts as a skin protectant and anti-irritant. It's also highly stable and non-irritating. It protects against UVB, UVA II, and UVA I almost uniformly, and is considered to be the broadest range sunscreen available today. The first main difference is that while TiO2 gives a nice broad spectrum protection, Zinc Oxide has an even nicer and even broader spectrum protection. Trimethylsiloxysilicate/Dimethiconol CrosspolymerĬopaifera Officinalis (Balsam Copaiba) Resinĭimethicone/Divinyldimethicone Silsesquioxane Crosspolymer Lauryl PEG-9 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone Trimethylsiloxysilicate/Dimethiconol Crosspolymer ,Ĭopaifera Officinalis (Balsam Copaiba) Resin,ĭimethicone/Divinyldimethicone Silsesquioxane Crosspolymer , We don't want to setĮxpectations and then disappoint readers as even products that are swatched don't always end upīeing reviewed due to time constraints and changes in priorities! Thank you for understanding! Comments on this post are closed.Lauryl PEG-9 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone ,
We appreciate enthusiasm for new releases but ask readers to please hold questions regarding if/whenĪ review will be posted as we can't commit to or guarantee product reviews. Will typically be removed after errors are fixed (unless a response is needed). Comments alerting us to typos or small errors in the post are appreciated (!) but Please help us streamline the comments' section and be more efficient: double-check the post aboveįor more basic information like pricing, availability, and so on to make sure your question wasn'tĪnswered already. Off-topic question, or need technical support, please Please keep discussion on-topic, and if you have general feedback, a product review request, an Discussion and debate are highly encouraged but we expect community members to They lasted between eight and nine hours on me before fading a little.īrowse all of our Tom Ford Beauty Shade & Illuminate Blush swatches. I didn't have any of those issues with the shades I tested they applied beautifully over bare skin and blended out with ease. The most impressive part about the formula was how well it applied over bare skin and still-damp foundation more matte finishes tend to "stick" and go on more patchily and often have to be applied over a mattified base. The coverage was versatile and seemed like it would be plenty for those who prefer more pigmentation but nothing that required a very light hand to start off with. The brand didn't make any claims regarding coverage, and my experience with these showed they were fairly pigmented-usually semi-opaque and buildable-but could be used with a lighter hand or less-dense brush for sheerer, more buildable coverage if desired. I was actually going through a real dry spell with my skin when I swatched and tested this range! I'd describe the finish was matte, and it'd be a stretch to even say semi-matte, but the powders were silky, smooth, and blendable and sat well on bare skin without emphasizing texture or dryness. The formula is supposed to be "silky-smooth" with "semi-matte and highlighting hues" for a "light-reflecting" glow.
0 kommentar(er)
